Joel Olufowote, PhD
  • Diversity, Inclusion, Belonging and Becoming for Starters

DEI Faculty Engagement Challenges? There's an "APP" for that

5/21/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
For the inclusive excellence specialist on the college campus, encouraging broad and wide engagement of THE faculty member in this work can be an oft-challenging pursuit. The reasons vary and I've found can range from point to point along the convincing to eye-rolling spectrum. Regardless of response, it is imperative THE faculty member remain central to the infusion of inclusive excellence on campus. They are our front-line workers that carry the ability to move the work at a productive and meaningful pace. Without THE faculty member comradery, administrative design and aspiration over inclusive pedagogy, praxis and responsiveness will fall short of its desired outcome.

CALLING ALL troubled Vice Presidents and Provosts, Deans and Executive Directors, Faculty Directors and THE inspired faculty member with roles, responsibilities, duties, and volunteer passions to engage your academic area in thought conversations around DEI! What comes next is exclusively for YOU.  

Answer the “Why?”
Faculty are smart. As a member of faculty over the last decade, my views here may be a biased, however, I am increasingly convinced engaging faculty in the work of DEI, without the threat of meeting fear or suspicion, must begin with “the why.” As national conversations over DEI increase and administratively enter the teaching and learning realm, it is imperative DEI practitioners recognize the sacredness of the space and provide faculty with value-laden justification of what may seem like external interference. I have found virtue in being direct about the “why” before any activity commences. Doing so helps alleviate what is often misplaced fear, anxiety, and suspicion. Being able to point the “why” back to institutional values and commitments, I find, provides the best climate and opportunity to do this work with an engaged faculty.  

Prepare an audit/tour.
As a DEI administrator, it is entirely plausible to enter this work with misguided assumptions that you were hired to “fix” faculty teaching and learning approaches. Such an assumption is costly, both for relational and operational reasons. It is wise for DEI practitioners to spend some time first learning what is happening on the ground! A firm understanding of what students are experiencing, some of the challenges faculty are facing, and what some immediate needs are, must be ascertained prior to meaningfully conducting this work with faculty. Unless one seeks to run the risk of alienation, taking the necessary time to ask questions, view classroom recordings and syllabi, and understand important nuance will likely generate favorable outcomes.

Provide examples of inclusive postures and opportunity areas.
I will bet the farm (I am neither a betting man nor do I own a farm, for what it is worth) that as a more accurate understanding of what is happening “on the ground” emerges, so, too, will excellent examples of inclusive postures and practices. Often, faculty just do not know how their leadership in the learning experience helps or hinders the creation of an inclusive space. Thus, there will be opportunities (after the “tour”) to use peer examples of what excellence in teaching and learning can look like, that may even surprise those that are/have adopted the approach! It is critical that the good work already being done is affirmed! There will also be opportunities to provide examples of gaps and/or opportunities that exist towards the robust creation of an inclusive learning environment. This is where the hard work begins.      
 
Refrain from top-down approaches and partner and equip.
As the work commences, it is critical that DEI administrators avoid leveraging positional authority to lead faculty and instead utilize authentic, peer-based strategies and partnerships. Frankly, the faculty are the experts in their discipline, not me. Ensuring that faculty sense genuine collaboration and partnerships is both strategic and will bear more fruit. Allowing faculty to bring in their own knowledge and expertise of subject matter and pedagogical/andragogic approaches to the larger discussion of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the learning environment will only help. As such, offering grassroot opportunities for faculty learning and development with administrative guidance is a good strategy to maintain faculty sovereignty and autonomy while ensuring administrative leadership.  

Empower early adopters.
Research suggests that in most communities of teaching and learning, there will be a myriad of postures towards the work of DEI. A cross-section of this group are those known as the “early adopters.” My observations over the last decade, specifically within the last five years, have led me to believe how DEI administrators engage the early adopters can impact the trajectory of the work in both helpful and potentially challenging ways. By definition, early adopters are, and have been, doing the work of DEI before the practitioner’s arrival. As a DEI administrator, it is important that embedded in the work is genuine appreciation of the early adopters. Competing with them, seeing them as adversaries or a distraction to the work will only limit its potential. Celebrating them, empowering them, providing the early adopters with leadership opportunities in the DEI teaching and learning space will propel the work forward. A philosophy of humility, recognizing that I am not the only expert and empowering those that exhibit proficiency and passion, will attract more so than detract faculty engagement.

Consider triangulating learning and development opportunities.
My political science background introduced to me to the concept of triangulation, an approach that simply suggests “mixing up” how one resources themselves and others. I find this philosophy greatly aids how I resource faculty. I have come to understand the myriad of sensitivities attached to this work that compels people like me to provide a variety of ways faculty can engage the broader topic. While committees are always a fun way to resource colleagues, some may prefer on-line methods that simply involve accessing resource links. Since on-line resourcing can be too distant for some, providing opportunities to learn and develop through lectures or workshops may better meet the needs of others. Unsurprisingly, offering diverse approaches for faculty growth and development around DEI teaching and learning is a wise strategy towards the pursuit of holistic faculty engagement.

Incentivize by rewarding enthusiasm with additional resourcing!
What would it look like if, instead of plaques and gift cards, enthusiasm and excellence in inclusive teaching was rewarded by additional resourcing to better hone skills? I find that truly invested faculty appreciate more the reinvestment of their growth and successes in increased opportunities to research, present at and attend conferences, workshops, among others, than they do through other recognition promoting measures that do not necessarily further accelerate their proficiency and competencies with inclusive teaching.     

-----Shift from faculty engagement ideas to administrative faculty engagement ideas-----

Assessment Strategies?
When I work with administrative faculty leaders such as deans and provosts in the academic realm, it is important I steward well my relationship with faculty by advocating on their behalf to senior academic leaders. As I invite faculty engagement into the DEI teaching and learning space, I must also inquire with senior leadership on ways to assess and evaluate faculty effectiveness and movement with inclusive teaching. Are student evaluations over impressions related to inclusive teaching part of DEI assessment and measurement? If so, what role do they play in yearly faculty evaluation? If not, is it important to consider implementing such an approach?

Tangible promotion/advancement opportunities alongside Faculty DEI pursuit?
Are student, peer, and colleague impressions of how one keeps an inclusive environment tied to tangible outcomes such as rank promotion, sabbaticals, and/or professional advancement and increase in compensation? Stewarding my relationship well with faculty involves asking hard questions of those that lead them and ultimately returns to the “why,” which must be clearly articulated back to faculty. While I may find the moral and humanistic imperatives of inclusive teaching compelling enough to consider adopting meaningful measures in my virtual and onsite courses, I also understand other faculty may simultaneously desire to know how doing so better elevates them professionally.     

Educationally rooted and embedded?
How engrained are the virtues of intercultural learning and culturally responsive teaching in the general curriculum? While I understand some universities primarily serve graduate students and “general education” may look different in this context, I think the broader question is still a worthwhile one to engage. In my journey, I have found faculty are likely to feel more empowered and become emboldened with inclusive teaching and learning when offered opportunities to create and teach courses that reflect the posture at-large. Engaging faculty in the DEI space requires the simultaneous “petition” to senior academic leaders of ways to best institutionally support them in the pursuit.
----
I consider this APPRECIATE philosophy two sides of the same coin; meaning, it is likely you cannot have one side without the other, and each side is of equal value. One side of this coin contains my plea for faculty to appreciate the challenges and opportunities of entering the DEI space to boldly conduct the work for the sake of our students. An inclusive teacher is an effective teacher to all students; however, an effective teacher will not always guarantee an all-encompassing inclusive one. The academy has many effective teachers but not because they are intentionally inclusive. They are only effective to some. The invitation to appreciate this challenge and opportunity in the pursuit of becoming an inclusive, ergo, better teacher to all, is at the forefront of my philosophy.

On the other side of the coin, APPRECIATE extends to how DEI practitioners engage the expertise and leverage the autonomy of the faculty and includes how I advocate for them, alongside them, as the journey continues. I do not believe in swarming faculty with policy, procedure, and expectations. Although there is a place for ensuring objectives and strategic initiatives are reached, this work is best conducted through an enhanced focus on the faculty member. Leveraging her experiences, knowledge, and aptitude to partner in the pursuit of inclusive and culturally responsive teaching and learning. This theme of partnership also extends to my relationship with senior faculty administrators. In my journey, I have found that creating pathways and plans for exceptional inclusive teachers to professionally advance in their careers is an often overlooked yet critical part of this work. A failure to appreciate the strengths and aptitude of the primary and proximate vessel through which this work is done will create barriers, not breakthrough. 

0 Comments

Shish Kebab Your Intercultural Leadership

6/11/2020

2 Comments

 
Picture
Hopefully the title of this article intrigues you enough to give it a quick click and further read. At this point, those of you brave enough to continue on are probably wondering whether this will be an analogous attempt to explain an ideal society by how the colors of a shish kebab work together. Not doing that, sorry. For the others—well, maybe your curiosity is likely centered on how this delicious, originally Mediterranean staple, the shish kebab, relates to my philosophical stance on the recent demonstrations, riots, and protests witnessed nationally in the wake of George Floyd’s murder. Not going there either. I mean, as a black male that oversees university intercultural literacy and inclusive excellence, I should have thoughts, right? Maybe even a statement? I should write one, right? Over the last few weeks, we’ve seen a variety of postures and read a number of statements from individuals far and wide. While I certainly have views that I’m happy to share, I choose to rather pit focus on what I’ve noticed as a glaring hole in the dissemination of more recent information and resources: how to better prepare our next generation of intercultural leaders, for the days to come, in a deeply divided world. Along the way I may also provide insight on how to create the perfect char-grilled shish kebab. Win-win, right?

On Tuesday evening we celebrated my wife’s 30th birthday by inviting several close friends and neighbors over to our home. It was a joyous event full of laughs, socially distant awkward side-hugs and fist bumps, a quick dip in the lake, and the best part—shish kebabs! For meal time, I borrowed a true and tested approach from Drs. John Foster and John Jackson (more on them to come) by adopting a make-your-own shish kebab station. As Dr. Foster would say, “there’s nothing more American than meat on a stick over a fire!” As I first learned back in 2009, the process involves grabbing a 10-12-inch bamboo skewer, placing already cut and cubed meat of choice on the skewer, adding onion and bell peppers at your intermittent discretion, and then plopping it on a grill (charcoal in our case) until ready. So simple, yet so delicious.  With a house full of 20-25 adults and about 10 kids, the shish kebab station serves as a quick, filling meal, adds to the overall joyous activity of the household and relieves the host of doing all the cooking!

I can’t thank Drs. John Foster and John Jackson enough for this idea. I imagine this approach being a continued party hosting technique in our house for years to come! I also owe Drs. Foster and Jackson deep gratitude for other reasons. 11 years ago, these two professors of political science and public policy hired me to my first intercultural leadership position and I have not looked back since (special shout out to Dr. J. Tobin Grant for the hookup). From 2009-2016, I spent several summer months consulting and organizing cultural exchange programs as part of a State Department funded initiative to welcome exceptional student leaders from around the world to study federal and state public policy in the United States. Year after year, it was in the tightly landscaped backyard of Dr. Foster with students from Nepal, Azerbaijan, Turkey, Myanmar, to name a few, that we became better acquainted with people from all over the world that are nothing like us, and the glorious shish kebab station. As I grew into my calling as an intercultural leader, I dipped a toe into diversity and inclusion programming as a full-time faculty member at a prior institution (more on this to come) and today, serve my current institution (I should probably note here that none of my views expressed here are that of the university I work for and yada yada) as an administrator over our global and intercultural programs and services. Over the last decade, or so, I’ve learned a lot about how to be an effective intercultural leader and these lessons have, ironically, come through failure. As many in our nation are experiencing the same tug-at-the-soul calling towards a vocation of intercultural leadership that I once felt in 2009, I’d like to offer some practical advice I would have given myself early on in my career (so you don’t fail as much as I did): Adopt the shish kebab framework of intercultural leadership.

Yes, the shish kebab framework of intercultural leadership- it’s a thing. Almost science. Similar to the perfectly crafted shish kebab with 5 deliberately placed pieces of meat and vegetables on the skewer (again, science), I offer 5 tips below on how to navigate your calling in the next season to come.   

  1. Prepare for Loss- If you are a novice to grilling shish kebabs like I was in 2009 in Dr. Foster’s backyard, chances are you will sacrifice some pieces of meat and vegetable to the charcoal gods before the skewer hits your plate. I cannot remember when I first successfully transferred the full five-piece skewer ensemble from grill to plate. It is infuriating! The grill being too hot, pieces of meat falling between the grill grates and forgetting it all together on the grill were some of the leading causes of shish kebab loss. It is inevitable.The inevitability of loss when proclaiming your bold intentions to do the work of diversity and inclusion in society or at your work place is also a stark reality. 11 years ago, I would have told myself that not everyone is going to like what I do and some, if not many, will choose to distance themselves from you. For some, you are challenging age-old assumptions and systemic norms that may be threatening. Whereas for the ambivalent others, they’d just much rather avoid the fatigue of the “highly charged stuff” that you deal with on a day-day basis. Get this—even those that may support you in your calling, may eventually decide you’re not doing enough or doing too much and lose faith in your philosophical approach! My advice: if you have a cheering squad now it will likely plateau in the next phase. Stay the course.

  2. Build a Team- One of the best, unintended (I promise), consequences of the kebab station is the “kebab manager.” The kebab manager is the guy/gal who, for no apparent reason, ends up watching everyone else’s kebab on the grill while its owners frolic and gallivant elsewhere. Maybe it’s the person that just really doesn’t want anyone to experience the loss described above. Or maybe it’s the person who just can’t watch Victor eat any more half raw, half cooked kebab’s and decides to take over. Who knows? Despite the explicit procedural rules and policies that specify it is a make-your-own and grill-your-own process, the kebab manager always mysteriously appears and often will delegate responsibility to others to care for the temporarily orphaned kebabs during his/her bathroom break. In 2013, I knew I had a passion for intercultural/diversity work on the college campus, I just didn’t know where to start. So, I built a team. I recall having a conversation with Megan Baldree and Dr. Vanessa Roberts-Bryan that eventually led to forming the Diversity Affairs Council with Erica Medina as our first student president. Years later, Megan, Vanessa, and I founded the Center for Community Inclusion on campus and with the help of Dr. Mark Waters, we were able to transform our campus in meaningful ways that touched the lives of many of our students. At my current institution, I inherited a phenomenal team upon my arrival in 2018 and have continued building along the way. My advice: You cannot do this work alone. Build a team. You will be better off for it in the long run.

  3. Dream Big but Start Small- As shish kebab grilling has taught me, patience is a virtue and it is one well worth exercising for that glistened, scrumptious meat on a stick delicacy. For years I looked with envy at Dr. Foster’s assembled mastery thinking I could certainly arrive there at a much quicker rate than what the process requires. Turning the skewer over early stalls your efforts. Taking it off the grill prematurely will give you bubble guts. Although tempting, anything more than 5 pieces of food on the skewer unnecessarily lengthens the cooking process and bitters the food altogether (remember, science). The heat of the grill ultimately decides when your kebab is perfect and the kebab does not, I repeat does not, acquiesce to any of your silly, hurried whims. People like us want to change the world. Call it an occupational hazard; the tendency to want to cure the “isms” and to have it done by yesterday carries such a heavy gravitational pull. As a result, we desire quick fixes. We want you to read all the books and articles, and listen to all the podcasts. I’m sure some of you reading this are also being bombarded by several colleagues and friends sharing anti-racist resources, podcasts on white privilege and fragility, the list continues. WE CAN’T HELP IT.  Chances are you won’t cure racism by lunch on Friday. My advice: Share (1) book, share (1) article, share one (1) podcast and do it all in the context of relationship. Someone who doesn’t know you or your intentions is not going to read your Dropbox folder full of anti-racist resources. Would you insist a child walks before they crawl? Would you give a bible to a convinced atheist to learn more about God?

  4. You Cannot Do This Work Well When Heated- If you’ve ever stood over a charcoal grill out in the open sun, on a 100-degree day with no shade in the humidity of Southern Illinois, this next tip should reason well. I’m sure Dr. Foster never planned it to be this way, but his summer cookouts always seemed to fall on the hottest, most humid day of the year. It is no surprise many of us, including yours truly, often escaped the scalding and suffocating heat by swiftly running indoors to enjoy a few moments of air-conditioning before returning back out to tend to our kebabs on the grill. Thank God for the “kebab manager” that kindly kept an eye on several, I’m sure, abandoned skewers simply due to the heat of it all! In a similar vein, the work of diversity and inclusion can become more difficult when we, as practitioners, are “heated” or angry. Please hear me correctly here: the issues we deal with can and should anger us! I often wonder, however, how many times I say the wrong thing or maybe even convey inaccuracies in posture and message when boiling mad. Equanimity is a word I love and one I would have offered myself 11 years ago when I first started my journey. My advice: Be angry, but not when you are doing the work. This work requires emotional balance, tact, and an irreplaceable ability to build bridges with ALL. There are enough obstacles you will face on your own journey; your vitriolic emotion should not be one of them. Let anger be the fuel to drive your passion forward.  

  5. Reserve and Prioritize Time for Self-Care- Grilling shish kebabs for the first few times hurt! There’s no perfect way to handle the slenderness of the bamboo skewer when on the grill and this often led many of us to resort to manually use our fingers to turn and flip the skewer. As you can imagine, blisters and band-aids were a common sight in the Foster household during his summer cookouts. For those of us that were new to grilling shish kebabs, one blister was all we needed before harkening the “kebab manager” to tend to our meats, while we painfully scurried indoors so Mrs. Terri Foster could tend to our (low level degree) burns. The work of diversity and inclusion that many-an intercultural leader commits to will, at some point, hurt you. As my colleague, Charissa Pierre, recently surmised, there is grave danger in doing this work day in and day out without instituting regular practices of self-care for you and/or your team. There will be burnout without such measures put into place. My advice: Decide now what your self-care routine will look like. It is very difficult for people like us (as I write this at 12:08am) to delineate between work and rest. If not addressed sooner than later, there will be no noticeable difference between the two and, ironically, both will suffer greatly.   

2 Comments

Systemically Unconscious: Re-imagining Bias Prevention Measures in the NFL

1/8/2020

1 Comment

 
Picture

Picture
Hindsight is 20/20. What is an oft-used phrase to convey the clarity time and space away can provide, I use here as an opening remark to underscore how this new year of 2020 also brings opportunity to review past practices, offer creative solutions, and reconsider the policies and procedures that shape the norms of our personal and professional experiences. The 'DIBBS' (Diversity, Inclusion and Belonging Blog for Starters) topic of review today is that of organizational bias training and prevention. Specifically, I draw conclusions on strategies universities can pursue to usher in comprehensive inclusive excellence by exploring how the National Football League has engaged matters of organizational equity among head coaches over the last 20 years.   

Matters of organizational culture, equity, and inclusion are topics of conversation from the C-suites of Fortune 500 companies to administrative cabinets and advisory boards of the non-profit, educational sectors. Despite the myriad of settings in which these conversations are held, a common thread exists: diversifying the workplace and creating inclusive systems and cultures. Can institutions of higher education learn from the NFL experience? In this inaugural blog post, I employ one of the more popular organizations in the United States, the National Football League, as a case-study that institutions of higher education can glean some wisdom on how (or how not) to create a truly diverse workplace. 

As media outlets, such as these on NPR and ESPN, recently cover, the National Football League is currently experiencing one of the worst seasons in the past two decades of minority coaching hires. Adding more complexity to this dynamic is the presence of the almost two decade old "Rooney Rule," intentionally established seventeen years ago to racially diversify the coaching ranks in a league with over 70% African-American players. While the Rooney Rule has led to an increased number of minority coaching hires since its inception, few would have imagined, then, that seventeen years later only three minorities will be head coaches of the 32-team league. Moreover, over the last three years only two African-Americans have been hired, out of 19 openings, for head coaching positions. Given the spirit and intent of the Rooney Rule policy, why has there been little-to-no actual progress on the racial diversification of NFL head coaches? A recent article published in Forbes
 magazine provides insightful commentary on how policies, such as the Rooney Rule, may temporary address issues pertaining to unconscious bias, yet fail to address the more pervasive systemic bias prevalent in many-an organizational culture.  

Types of Biases
Although the practice of unconscious bias and systemic bias share many surface commonalities, they differ at the root. While the former tends to focus on the uninvestigated blind spots individuals bring into the workplace, the latter shifts perspective on how organizations and institutions themselves perpetuate the status-quo. Concisely put, the focal point with unconscious bias is people, whereas with the systemic kind, the focal point moves to the organization. Since organizations are made up of people, the delineation between the two can be a blurry one, hence my desire to  to place concept into context through a deeper delve into the bizarre case of the NFL and the Rooney Rule. 

Unconscious bias prevention training is both good and necessary, although incomplete without intentional efforts against systemic bias. The current plight of minority coaches in the NFL is a sobering realization of how practitioners of inclusive excellence (such as myself) often fail to address both varieties of bias. Whereas unconscious bias training needs practitioners to encourage employees to engage in reflective exercises and to consider alternative approaches or ideas, the eradication of systemic biases requires more than a knowledgeable practitioner- it requires an organizational anthropologist, capable of addressing biases of people and places. 

The NFL and Systemic Bias
The Rooney Rule was supposed to solve the racial inequity present among coaching hires in the NFL. Evidence from the first week of the year in 2020 suggests not much ground has been made. Could it be the Rooney Rule is a prime example of policies that aim to address the unconscious bias found in people, yet neglect the systemic biases of the NFL itself? The Rooney Rule, in large, was a response to the firing of two prominent and successful African-American head coaches in the early 2000's. Buttressed by a provocative study suggesting minority coaches are less likely to be hired and more likely to be fired than white coaches (with poorer winning margins), the Rooney Rule squarely placed head coaching vacancies in the center of NFL efforts towards creating and maintaining an inclusive and diverse workplace.

The issue with the Rooney Rule is not found in its intent but rather with its scope. Any policy meant to encourage the hires of minority employees will only produce minimal results without addressing the systemic  D.N.A. of the organization itself. The racial inequities found in the NFL coaching ranks are not solved by enforcing rules about who team personnel must interview (emphasis on minority coaches and those that interview them- people) and more about understanding the network of franchise owners through time.
​
Taking a look at the racial profile of NFL franchise ownership and length of ownership time can help better understand why the Rooney Rule has failed to live up to expectations. While overwhelming focus has been at the coaching levels, the systemic network of franchise ownership is untouched by policy or procedure to enhance diversity. As the illustration shows, 30 of the 32 NFL franchises are owned by non-minorities, and 75% of owners have held majority ownership rights for over 20 years without transfer. As the coaching carousels spin their wheels to ensure minority candidates receive opportunities, the systemic backbones of the franchises remain the same. 

In 2017, the opportunity to diversify the ranks of franchise ownership opened up when the Carolina Panthers became available for sale.
Sean "P-Diddy" Combs, a successful, African-American entertainment entrepreneur voiced interest in becoming the NFL's first black  owner but it is unclear whether Combs made an official bid. In 2018, the Carolina Panthers were sold to billionaire David Tepper, who is white. At the time, the coach for the team, Ron Rivera, who has since been fired and is now the coach of the Washington Redskins was one of the few minority head coaches in the league. To replace Rivera, on January 7, 2020, the Carolina Panthers hired Matt Rhule, former collegiate head coach, who happens to be white. Quoting team owner Tepper on the Rhule hire,"He dresses like me, so I have to love the guy. I was a short-order cook, he was a short-order cook. Nobody gave him anything, nobody gave me anything." On a surface level, Tepper's comments can merely be seen as an owner voicing support for his new hire. A critical view of Tepper's comments, however, reveals a more concerning issue at play. 

Biases Left Unchecked Matter
Well, of course they do! Uninvestigated biases and predispositions can reproduce systems and patterns of inequity. Here, however, the distinction between unconscious and systemic biases matters just as much! If one part of the NFL system — coaching — is working to eliminate unconscious biases among its members, but another part of the NFL system —owners — are not, then inequity in coaching ranks and further marginalization of diverse candidates, despite the Rooney Rule, is likely to continue, and it has! I imagine Tepper meant no harm with his commentary on the Rhule hire. Nevertheless, when (the majority white) owners of the franchises commissioned to act upon the Rooney Rule openly express preferences for coaching candidates because they are reminded of themselves in the hire (and if 30 of the 32 franchise owners are doing the same thing), systemic biases are clearly in play. As a university administrator, I'm tempted to draw corollaries between bias prevention methods in the NFL with that of institutions of higher education. We often pay large sums for diversity consultants and administrative personnel to help us overcome issues of bias through training and developmental workshops that hopefully generate increased diversity employee hires, their retention, and improve overall campus climate. These strategies alone may succeed at bringing awareness about the temporal unconscious factors preventing equity in employee and student profile, but fail at truly investigating the systemic and organizational norms that often precede these surface realities.

​Similar to NFL franchise owners, university administrators and trustees (the systemic stakeholders) must be a central piece of bias investigation and training for true progress to occur. Alongside the genuine intentions behind bias exercises, policy reformulations and reconsideration, inclusive excellence is best achieved with a healthy dose of anthropological investigation into past and present organizational norms and culture. As organizations such as the NFL and institutions of higher education pursue equitable outcomes, sustained transformation is more likely when we shift from the unconscious and delve into the systemic.    


1 Comment

    Welcome to my blog!

    Thanks for visiting! In this space,  I will sporadically share my thoughts related to academia, diversity, equity, and inclusion and other tangentially related topics. Please note that my views shared here are of my own and do not necessarily represent the sentiments of any of my employers. 

    ​Enjoy!
Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.